whom? Why not insure qutaily teachers are employed to teach our children?It seems as if the more businesses get involved in Denver Public Schools, the more schools they find unfit. Then, the business comes in and throws money in and at Denver Public Schools and their administrators decides its time to close schools and build new ones. I don't understand the logic. How are the children benefiting? What are Nate Easley and the other board members doing for our children? Is it always going to be corporate-driven? Is it whatever Superintendent Boasberg says and there is no discussions and/or desires to encourage growth in our children? (I have not forgotten Michael Bennet's ideas of what our children need. His plan was all about self-promoting himself while deceiving DPS employees out of their pensions.) Although I have not attended recent board meetings, I have been reading board member, Ms. Andrea Merida's posts and it is obvious which side Mr. Easley stands and he is NOT in favor of the students. As previously stated, he is just going along to get along; making a name for himself. Honestly, I have nothing against anyone who self-promotes, but only when it sincerely assists others. It should not be about me, but what I can do for others. (Oh this me, me and what about me society.)I'm sure Nate Easley made a promise an oath to work for the best interest of our students. HUMPH, I DISAGREE!Oh how hard it is to live next door to a FORMER Nate Easley supporter. Balloters need to read and research those who NEED our vote and not just listen to the lip service and remember the old adage: Talk is cheap.